It's true, I owned a Casio PDAI recently decided to jump into the ebook market. I've been following it for quite some time but could never justify being an early adopter with the Sony line and figured I'd just wait it out. I have many fond memories of getting involved with project Gutenberg back in 2002 and discovering the immense library of public domain texts. At the time I read exclusively on a Cassiopeia E-125 but my commitment to ebooks waned as I upgraded devices and became far more involved in pursuing my degree.
Then iOS happened and Apple introduced their bookstoreI was initially quite interested in the concept of reading on my iPhone, again harkening back to the Casio days when I was traveling often for work and reading quite a bit. I bought a book, on a whim and out of other reading material, when coming back from a business trip in Oct 2010. I loved the book I read and I loved the convenience of my iPhone. But, quite frankly, it took it's toll physically on my eyes as well as making me wish swipe was never invented. My lasting impression was how much a hassle it was just to turn the pages, over and over and over.
Eink contenders aplenty, turns out I want an ecosystem tooFor a long time I followed what Sony was doing and watched various other Chinese manufacturers make eink-based device announcements. However, I was never motivated to purchase because I realized (over several years of following) that the hardware was only half the solution for my ideal setup. While I loved reading on the Casio, it wasn't particularly enjoyable loading my ebooks from Project Gutenberg and it got messy managing things when my library became large (not to mention the lack of availability of new publications).
Bottom line, I finally think the market is in a mature-enough place (though far from ideal maturity IMO) that I didn't considered anything other than the Kindle 3 or the Nook.
Grading criteriaI've been patient, for a long time, and have been mentally recording a healthy list of criteria that I wanted to measure. Yes, there are dozens of reviews on both of these devices, but I frankly wasn't satisfied with what I'd read because I wanted a hands-on, personal, thorough evaluation for just my list of requirements. Thus, the following opinion/analysis really only satisfies what I care about and, of course, YMMV. What I wanted to evaluate, in no particular order:
- The Feel
The Kindle is lighter than the Nook, but that didn't make it an immediate winner. I liked the extra weight on the Nook that made it feel more handleable (is that a word?). However, with the extra weight, the Nook felt slightly more fragile and I noticed I was more careful when carrying it while walking and reading or doing other activities rather than just staying put and reading. The Kindle, though lighter, also seemed more robust and resilient.
- Affordance and Input
(in terms of how intuitive it was to use the device both visually and non-visually and also how intuitive the initial experience was)
Kindle: The page turning buttons are slimmer than the Nook but (again, IMO) more well defined both physically and visually. The keyboard and 5-way button provide immediate input and tactile response. The overall experience of getting to know, and get comfortable, with the device was very natural to me.
Nook: The Nook navigation buttons have little visual separation other than the large arrows, but physically the user can feel the difference due to a raised bump. On more than one occasion I inadvertently navigated in the wrong direction. After a while I got used to it and I like how much wider the buttons were than the Kindle, though with the additional width the user loses grip area. I did not like the LCD navigation, and maybe that's because I tested the Kindle first, but I found the navigation slow (in response to gestures), slightly confusing (scrolling options) and generally less appealing. Plus, the backlight is a strong contrast to the placid eink display for my eyes (yes, the backlight dims very quickly, but the combination just didn't work for me)
- Instapaper support
I like Instapaper a lot. It saves me time. It removes content distractions. It lets me collect stuff that's not important to read immediately, but important enough that I want to read it when I'm ready (meaning, when I have more time). It's convenient (works in all browsers), works on multiple devices (iOS, Android, Blackberry) and is simple to use (one click). So, if I want to read my Instapaper content on the Kindle or Nook, what are my options? Just Kindle.
- File archiving
Both B&N and Amazon have areas where the user can download previously purchased content. There was, at one time, legitimate concern about Amazon exercising the remote kill switch (as it did once), but under terms of the suit settlement they agreed that it will not happen in the future.
- Notes and highlights (I like to annotate, not all the time, but frequently)
Kindle: Notes can be multi-lined and added to all content. User moves cursor and starts typing.
Nook: Notes are limited to a single line and not available for PDF content. User awakens LCD, selects menu option, selects another menu option, move cursor with d-pad, selects menu option, moves cursor, selects menu option, begins typing note.
- API (since I like to play with code)
Kindle: KDK available here
Nook: No API or development kit available (though rumor has it the color version will soon be unlocked for full the full Android Marketplace)
Performance was pretty good in terms of rendering and input responsiveness. The only times I noticed a difference was when comparing menu navigation, but since the menu approach was unique to each device, I'm not going to compare the menu performance in conjunction with general use. The eink refresh was fast enough to never annoy me and they both seemed nearly identical in that regard.
From what I understand lending is currently subject to publisher overview, so I didn't notice a unique advantage comparing one device to the other. Both vendors allow a single-use, 14-day lend on publisher-approved books.
Winner: Tie (user is equally hosed regardless of vendor, sigh)
- PDF Support
Turns out this feature became more important to me the more I thought about it. There are many times I have technical PDFs open on my desktop that I just don't get around to reading in a timely manner. After testing two of the latest (this and this), I was sold on being able to not only read these but also annotate them.
Kindle: Multiple rendering options to adjust zoom and device orientation. Five contrast settings. Supports notes and highlights. Graphics properly rendered, layout preserved. Overall, very readable and usable.
Nook: Supports three different text fonts and six text sizes. Mangled embedded graphics in my evaluation. Subject to layout mishandling and text injections (first PDF was very difficult to follow). No annotation support or additional rendering options. One time I got an error indicating I needed to force close the Activity Reader when I was navigating a PDF.
Kindle: No user extendable memory or replaceable battery
Nook: User replaceable battery and microSD slot located underneath rear cover (thanks Cary A. and Jeff J. on this!)
- Battery life
I wasn't sure how I was going to accurately measure this. Turns out I didn't have to worry about it. I've had both of these devices for several weeks now (time of this post) and have been using the Kindle quite a bit more than the Nook at this point. I charged both devices before my evaluation. At no time during the past several weeks have I charged either device and only minimal time in syncing via USB. Thus, after finishing my first book on the Kindle I was ready to read something of equivalent length on the Nook to test it out. Unfortunately, the battery was nearly depleted. And that was after being powered-off, nearly every day, for more than a week. I finished up the lengthy user manual and settled on a book to try, then powered down the device. I turned it on the following day to be greeted with the message that it needed to be charged (which it is doing at this time). Maybe I have a defective battery? The Kindle, under much heavier comparative use, appears to be at slightly less than 50%. Scientific approach? No, I wussed out, this is good enough for me.